Thursday, February 9, 2017

Some Quick Thoughts On An MLS Stadium


Well, I guess the electorate of STL is all of a sudden respected. If you recall, we were decidedly not thought to be worthy of voting on the Rams stadium debacle (check the record on the aldermen who voted for that mess...and who are running for office).

Now remember, if you live a couple feet west of Skinker Boulevard, a few feet south of the River Des Peres, a few feet west of Cement land or a few feet east of the halfway point on the Stan Span, you don't matter in this conversation. 

If you are a suburbanite, you are not being asked to pay for an MLS stadium. You are not being asked to pave a massive expanse of land in your city for surface parking lots that get used maybe 20 days a year. And most importantly, you don't get to vote on whether STL gives ~$60M in tax money to pay for a MLS stadium. 

You are irrelevant if you don't live in STL when it comes to an MLS stadium. 

Why? Because the suburban cities in the areas surrounding STL don't want anything to do with giving public tax dollars to the prospective MLS ownership group (who I'm almost certain don't even live in STL).

There is no regional taxing district for sports arenas. Outside of the ZMD and GRG initiatives, there is little desire to share in this region.  STL is expected to carry the weight on regional issues, both ones the county people want and of course the ones they want absolutely nothing to do with. For instance, can you imagine the county taking an equal part in caring for the homeless, the growing population of elderly on fixed incomes or oxy/heroin/meth/crack/booze addled members of our region? 

No, these are STL problems. We are expected to take these things on...and of course the stadiums/parking lots for hockey, baseball, soccer and any other sport you can imagine.

I'm feeling cynical lately, forgive me. I just don't think people like County Executive Steve Stenger want anything to do with STL. And sadly, I feel he's the voice of the angry people I hear in the burbs who hate STL and it's problems both perceived and real.

But a vote on an MLS stadium is coming up (if you live in STL)...and what American doesn't love a vote?

I take a vote very seriously. I try to do my best to educate myself, be fair, compromise and think of the greater over my selfish interests.

But this MLS ownership group has asked ONLY STL for tax $ to pay for their stadium. Their... Who is they? I'm not sure I can put a face to the names. I'm not sure I've met them or seen them at any neighborhood meetings of public forums in STL to drum up support and make us want to support them.

Who are these guys? Will I know by April when I get to vote on this $60M or so of our hard paid dollars.

Imagine an alternate past where this MLS ownership group showed themselves before they made the ask. Sure they are likely staunch county boys, rich kids all grown up and successful and connected. Good for them. But they're probably genuine, well-meaning people. We are all reasonable Midwesterners, no?  Heck, STL people loved the Busch family well after they left for Sunset Hills and Huntleigh and other areas outside of STL...even in the post-In-Bev days, we still seem to love them.

When will this ownership group let us know how much they love soccer (their last pitch was for NFL football) and apologize for not introducing themselves earlier.

It's been too long, guys.

St. Louis is a small town (~300K) and most people know each other, or at least recognize each other. But few in STL know these guys...at least the people in my small hoi-polloi circles.

What if they acknowledged the huge ask of $ they were making on us. What if they acknowledged the need for strong schools and crime prevention in STL, yet made a convincing pitch for their investment in a team and stadium we would (by default) own? 

What if they threw us a bone for our vote?

What if they signed a city contract to donate money/build three quality soccer fields in STL for the CYC and SLPS to use. (currently there are 0). What if they committed to aerate, seed and water said fields for 30 years? What if they vowed to pay for SLPS/CYC/Charter school soccer coach/referee training programs?

If you think soccer is big in St. Louis please come witness the fields the CYC league plays on. Please come with me and walk the fields the SLPS high school league plays on. Let me show you the field one of the greatest middle schools in the country practices on. Let's meet the soccer coaches in St. Louis and see what they want/need.  

I've heard nothing like that...just that we're dumb and missing out on this amazing opportunity to build a stadium. Um, we've got 3, two with teams in them...and they are just not helping us gain residents and money. Check the stats guys.

The 100 or so cities in the suburbs outside of St. Louis have a rich history investing in soccer programs and fields. Look no further than the impressive soccer park off of I-44 just west of I-270. St. Louis has nothing like this. Nor does St. Louis have plans for anything like this. We have bigger fish to fry. We're not at the stage of building soccer field or rock climbing in our schools or neghborhoods yet...maybe you guys could help us.

But these regional leaders/investors who don't live here or care about crime/schools/neighborhoods here want our public money and are willing to give up none of theirs.

Float me a plan that makes sense. Throw me a bone. Give me some reason to believe. I'm a taxpayer, a resident, a dad, a voter in St. Louis...the one city in this 2-state, 100 or so city region that will decide the fate of soccer for now.

As of now, this ownership group has given St. Louis people very little to grasp onto. 

Memories of Kroenke and the great County rulers so close but yet so far from St. Louis are swimming in my mind.

I'll remain a skeptic until this group of investors shows up here....in St. Louis...to make their pitch.

April is just around the corner.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Did you attend any of the town halls that the owners had? Just curious. Let's take a closer look at some of the facts:
--New construction jobs (450 union jobs)
--New permanent jobs (428, full time, well paying union jobs)
--80% private investment, 20% public investment
--Team pays ALL maintenance, operations, and upgrade costs
--Team pays rent to the city, city rents out facility to other tenants as they see fit (concerts, festivals, high school/college sporting events...)
--$406MM in labor income, $556 MM in value to the city economy
--30 year lease with no loopholes. Team CANNOT leave like the Rams did.
--Independent public audits
--Unprecedented private investment in youth soccer and character development
--If you do not attend events at the venue, you will not be paying the tax

Anonymous said...

Forbes economics article. Well worth the read.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2017/03/30/st-louis-mls-bid-a-fiscally-responsible-partnership-with-unprecedented-city-community-benefits/#13196a136f2b